On 24 July I stuck my neck out and wrote about Wilderness magazine showing a group crossing a river using a strange and dangerous rivercrossing technique.
See No way to cross a river and then back button to here.
The August issue of the magazine had a letter from Russell Chilton of Ashburton commenting on the photo:
Poor example
... The method shown in the photo gives next to no support if one person in the group slips and falls. In fact, it is downright dangerous. I am disappointed that an "experienced" group of trampers should even think of using the method shown, let alone submit a photograph of it to your magazine...
I met Russell at a Mountain Safety Council training weekend at Craigieburn few years ago. He's a very experienced MSC instructor and a hunter and well qualified to make the comments he did. So I was glad to see him sharing the same concerns I had.
Wilderness magazine Editor Colin Moore added a note at the end of Russell's letter that he didn't think the group actually crossed the river linked up like that.
I don't know why he wrote that as my information, from people who were there, is that they did.
I didn't mention the connection with the Christchurch Tramping Club in my original post. I might as well have though as most of the people in the photo are well known in the outdoors as as being in the CTC.
Alan Ross has openly defended their decision for being linked up for the rivercrossing the way they were.
Well I don't know, Alan.... loyalty is a fine thing but....
I haven't come across anyone who knows of that technique being recommended on any rivercrossing course the tramping club, or anyone else, has run. So it really has the appearance that it was just dreamed up at the time.
All I can say is it doesn't do the club any good if it wants to have a reputation for competence in the outdoors.
The shame of all this is Honora is putting a lot into making sure the best training is available in the CTC. And maybe it's just the club's long-of-tooth and longer winded that are letting the side down.
Recent Comments